Technorati Tags: word,write,living word,redefine,vocabulary,dictionary,energy charge,negativity,positivity,consequence,outflow,program,earth,journey,bernard poolman,desteni,eqafe
This is a continuation of the previous blogs:
What is clear about words that are defined within and as self as polarized words, are that they are reactive in nature. Meaning when carrying
a negatively or positively charged word within and as self, this polarity charged word will ‘react’ within its environment seeking out designs of ‘homeostasis’ or ‘winning’. The consequential outflows of negatively and positively charged words are predetermined in that they follow a specific pre-programmed path.
For instance – Using our example of kindness:
When one is the ‘giver’ of ‘kindness’ – Self is in a position where self is experiencing the positive charge of the word. When the other
person rejects your act of kindness, one of the predetermined paths of the program is to react to the person’s rejection of your kindness and become snappy with them. As the belief within self is that self was ‘kind’ to the person and they rejected your act of perceived good.
What is not realized within these interactions among communication is that these are pre-programmed acts that we live out and express within our interactions with others. These words as polarized words are pre-programmed designs that we believe we are living, when in fact we are only reacting to the polarity designs that we have accepted and allowed ourselves to become. We believe that we have free choice in how we respond, how we react, how we participate, yet we live the pre-programmed designs of how we have accepted the polarity designs of words within and as ourselves.
As long as words are polarized within our definitions of ourselves we are subject to the polarity games being played as the words within and as ourselves are directing us through the energy that is generated within us through the friction of the interaction of polarized words.
The definitions of words as we have accepted and allowed them within and as ourselves become the expressions that we live, the expressions that we act out, becomes who we express ourselves as.
It is thus common sense to realize that, what we place as definitions within and as ourselves is what we manifest within the expression of ourselves. For instance – we have given words meaning through polarizing them and as a manifested consequential outflow we are living competition and comparison as external accepted expressions of our social reality.
Removing the polarity designs out of words and redefining words to the direct expression of what they represent we create a consequential outflow of an expression of oneness and equality.
What is certain about polarized words are their pre-programmed design which have specific paths of consequential outflows which we are able to identify and see for ourselves by walking the timeline of how the word will play out within an interactional situation. What is also certain is that a polarity game will be played as the building blocks of the words that we speak contain a polarity that seeks out ‘win’; and what becomes certain within such a game is that there is always a winner and always a loser. Realizing this and understanding this makes one ask the question: What is this all for then? Why do we perpetuate the same game over and over again? Why not just stop and learn how to express self as life – not just a pre-programmed design.
This is why we redefine words; to find the living expression evident in each word from the principle of oneness and equality. As we look at a word we are moving ourselves through the word to see what it represents and what it stands for as a living expression. By assigning a definition to the word we are developing our vocabulary by placing within the definitions, living definitions that stand free from polarity which are able to stand as living expressions of the words that we have redefined.